Wednesday, 4 July 2012
Avengers Vs X-Men - Round 7 By Aaron / Bendis / Brubaker / Fraction / Hickman / Coipel
'No More Avengers' - not quite the game changing statement of intent that it was clearly intended to be, but Cyclops' proclamation at the end of the previous issue certainly upped the ante to a considerable degree. Those expecting a similarly aggressive seventh issue are likely to left disappointed however - despite no shortage of action and bloodshed, this is a relatively tame issue as far as genuine shock and intrigue go.
This is certainly a series that has lived up to its rather confrontational title, and this issue carries on gamely. Fraction's script does feature its fair share of conversation inbetween the riotous action, but it feels a little as though it is merely filling the space before fight scenes that are beginning to feel inevitable. To his credit though, Fraction does manage to fit in a good amount of characterisation into his script, some of it fairly subtle. Cyclops has been the stand out character so far, and continues to straddle a fine line between strangely likeable anti hero and reprehensible arch-villain. It is to the writers credit that they have managed to portray him in such a nuanced way, and transform one of the Marvel Universe's most iconic heroes into arguably its most memorable antagonist in recent years.
Indeed, at this stage the mutant side of the battle are emerging as a far more interesting group of characters. The Avengers are all characterised well enough here - and Black Panther's mid issue outburst was certainly a surprise - but they do not excite in the same way, and there is little to suggest that they will be as affected by the events of this series as the mutants will. Many of the ideas being introduced seem a little half baked, and are not being given the attention that they probably merit.
Another competent issue, but a predictably disjointed one. Fraction's script is decent but his pacing feels strange, and he struggles to create any sense of intrigue or interest in the Avengers role in the story. Cyclops is still stealing the show, but few other characters are shining, and despite brief hints to the contrary it seems that the majority of development will be occuring in the series' many tie ins. A shame, as the premise of the plot is still sound and deserves more than the skeletal story that we appear to be getting.
Tuesday, 3 July 2012
Whether fairly or not, much of the clamour surrounding the Amazing Spider-Man has been focused on questioning it. Was the revamped costume a good idea? Would Spider-Man's iconic origin story remain intact? And perhaps most importantly, should the film even exist? Perhaps a slightly melodramatic phrasing, but a more than valid musing. A full reboot of the Spider-Man movie franchise just a decade after it was launched is a drastic step, even if Spider-Man 3 was something of a disappointment and Sam Raimi's plans for Spider-Man 4 reeked of a director being let a little too far off his leash.
An unfortunate by-product of its close proximity to Raimi's trilogy is that it is very difficult to judge Marc Webb's follow up on its own merits. Every storytelling choice and character is automatically placed under the microscope, and it has to be said that they do not measure up particularly well. Spider-Man's origin is intact here despite suspicion that Webb would opt against yet another retelling, and he adds little of note to the iconic story first told in Amazing Fantasy #15. There are tweaks - and a couple are likely to annoy some hardcore fans - but there is nothing earthshattering here. The film's cast is a real mixed bag too. Martin Sheen manages to breathe life into the somewhat temporary role of 'Uncle' Ben Parker, but Sally Field is forgettable as Aunt May - arguably one of the most important members of Spider-Man's supporting cast. Denis Leary is the pick of the bunch as hard-nosed Captain George Stacy, and his character arc is the strongest of the film, even when set against the surprisingly impressive Chris Zylka, who plays bully with a heart of gold 'Flash' Thompson.
Of the leads, Emma Stone has already managed to surpass Kirsten Dunst as love interest of choice and is very impressive, managing to add depth to a character whose comic incarnation is often accused of being one note. Andrew Garfield gives a curious performance - he seems more at ease as wise cracking, light hearted Spider-Man than Toby Maguire ever was, yet seems uncomfortable as Peter Parker, and fails to give the character the meekness and humility that defined his early years. Playing opposite him Rhys Ifans is surprisingly bland as Curt Connors, and his scaly, villainous alter ego is equally uninspired. His links to Peter's parents are interesting, but never explored enough - although this is of course something very much left open ended.
Perhaps Webb's greatest weakness as a director is his unwillingness to use some of the strongest aspects of the source material. Jonah Jameson is absent, and although attempts are made to transpose his character onto George Stacy they are never quite successful and are curtailed by the end. In fact, aside from a very brief cameo the Daily Bugle is entirely ignored, despite a bizarre desire to emphasise Peter's interest in photography. Potential material for a sequel, maybe, but it feels strange within the context of the film. Aunt May's role is severely limited too, and while Norman Osborn is mentioned a couple of times, his son Harry is never mentioned, and is really missed as a 'buddy' for Peter.
While it may seem unfair to hold this reboot of the franchise up against Sam Raimi's original trio of films, it is impossible not to, and when judged by their merits it is difficult to look at this opening salvo particularly positively. Its script is patchy, with average dialogue, some of which seems written for the trailer. Yes, some of the action sequences work well and feature solid choreography, but it seems redundant with such a weak choice of villain. The Lizard seems to borrow heavily from both Doctor Octopus and the Green Goblin, while retaining none of their visual splendour, depth, or superb casting. Even Peter Parker feels off colour, with an attitude that is hardly in keeping with his comic book counterpart. The Amazing Spider-Man is not a disaster, nor is it too much of a misstep for the franchise. It can however be improvement upon, and should be in time for the inevitable sequel.